Creation Verse Evolution

Give me more time to think and I will come up with an answer. But…
#1. It must match my worldview
#2. It will prove me right after all
#3. I will not have to consider your argument because I am smarter than you are. { I have a science degree }

There is something interesting that happens over and over again and that is the fact that any worldview is a faith based view. First of all let’s lay down a foundation for a view point. At the outset of this article we posed an answer to a question yet there were stipulations. This is typical of anyone who climes to be somewhat intelligent or educated. They do not want to believe that they missed the mark by very far. If one is forced to believe they missed the mark by a great margin that would be a crisis and very detrimental to any scientist. As humans we continually try to identify with the world around us and in every situation we find ourselves. Rethinking conclusions is something unpleasant for anyone but when someone stakes their whole career on being right such the pain is obvious.


What is wrong with being rational? Rational thinking indeed has its benefits but even such thinking can prove to be a real challenge when introduced with real scientific evidence. It can be a real mind boggle when we try to entertain thoughts of the universes beginning, especially when all evidence seems to support that claim. So can we conclude that rational thinking is wrong? Of course not especially when being rational endorses such qualities like patience.  Rational thinking is scientific thinking and just like science it does have its limits. Scientific things do exist that do not have a rational answer.


“There is no right or wrong answer” is such an ambiguous statement and any passionate person on either side of the arguments will not be satisfied with just lame claims. This sets the stage for losers and winners in the “creation verse evolution” arena. Who has the most satisfying answers to the evidence presented? Gloves are off let the arguments begin and may the best man win.


As with any debate, there must be a structure laid out that brings some kind of order to the process. That being stated the structure of our material will be as follows.  First the evidence will be presented and then we will have the secular evolutionist point of view and then a creationist point of view. The interpretations will be left up to you the reader and me the author. We will start with best evidence for evolution and then best evidence for creation and go back and forth in our exhibits.




Exhibit #1 – Tree of life. Different creatures closely resemble other creatures and as you continue to compare their similarities they generally grow more distant but can be connected by some sort of mechanisms. Example horses, zebras, donkeys resemble each other. Tigers, lions, cats in another group. Yet, Dogs and jellyfish have fewer things in common so they would be placed further apart on this tree of life.


Evolutionary explanation: Common Decent – The scientific theory that all living organisms descended from one common ancestor. Their claim is proof in the fossil record. They point to the evolution of horses, whales and others.



#1 their conclusion is that everything produced offspring in the fossil record.

#2 their conclusion is that since one resembles another that it must of come from the        one that is similar to it. This is a fallacy because if the entire world was destroyed today it       would be inappropriate to conclude that the bigger horses descended from the smaller          horses in a fossil record etc.


Creation explanation: The tree of life exists nowhere except in the imaginations of the evolution enthusiast. The differences are more important than the similarities.



Time, space, matter the cause and effect principal

Cause and effect is a fact, things just do not happen. This is the very basics of science. I am sure anomalies exist but I cannot give my mind over to the chaotic and agnostic reasoning that some are comfortable with. If you believe science is a “good tool” and NOT a belief system then we cannot ignore certain facts. Gravity, orbits, micro evolution just to mention a few. I am concerned that people are just too comfortable with unfounded and untested conclusions.

If a person is a fan of some scientist or group it seems to me like they don’t question them when they propose outlandish theories. Time, space and matter all had a beginning. There had to be a cause for this. When people propose that it was all just a matter of chance and luck, I believe they have given themselves over to an unreasonable explanation. The logical explanation is that there was something or someone outside time, space and matter that is responsible for them. Until cause and effect is disproved then that is the most reasonable and logical conclusion.

Evolution vs Creationism

Evolution vs Creationism

Evolution vs Creationism is a pretty hot topic. When we look at it from a scientific point of view then one who is honest with themselves have to consider the other sides point of view. I think the the satisfactory answers are few and far between when it comes to the big questions. How we got here is one of those big questions. Never the less we are here and our curiosity rages wild in many respects regarding this subject. To an atheist the evolution theory is the only game in town so they have to defend it both tooth and nail. To one who believes that God did it all then they tend to go toward the other extreme. I rarely find anything that is so cut and dry or black and white if you will.


So our origins become a political battle more than a scientific one. According to the Wikipedia this debates rages most publicly in the United States.  If you look at the title Creation-evolution controversy you will see what I mean. They also claim the Evolution is an undisputed fact yet, is that not a little presumptions when there are several different types of evolution. Evolution is a fact  when it comes to plant and animal life yet even within this structure there are many things that have to be imagined. If it is imagined then it is not a scientific fact.  For something to be a scientific fact it has to be observed repeatedly. No doubt there are many evolutionary scientific facts that have been observed and repeated many times.

Here are some examples. Escherichia coli – This is a study that has been going on since 1998 is where the 12 populations generated hundreds of millions of mutations over the first 20 thousand generations.  In the end all 12 populations showed an increase in cell size and a more rounded cell shape. In another study the Italian wall lizard was taken from the island of Kopiste and transported 3.5km east to the island of Mrcara. In the 1990’s scientist returned to the island and found that the limbs had grown longer and there were changes in foraging styles.

So how does this affect the origins? Well one would have to leave it up to the imagination would they not? In the end the ecoli was still ecoli and the lizards were still lizards.

Evolution vs Creationism Evolution vs Creationism ecoli

Other types of Evolution

1. Cosmic evolution – never observed or repeated or tested.

2. Chemical evolution – never observed or repeated or tested

3. Stellar-evolution – never observed or repeated or tested

4. Organic-evolution – never observed or repeated or tested

5. Macro-evolution – never observed or repeated or tested

6. Micro-evolution – observed or repeated or tested




30 reasons Why Evolution is Wrong!

1. The evolution of one kind into another kind is not happening in a
measurable way in the present, nor can it be proven to have occurred in the

2. No new kinds of organisms are being observed coming from previously
existing organisms. (We “discover” new kinds that we have never cataloged
before, but this only shows our ignorance of their existence.)

3. No new structures or organs have been observed coming into existence.
All observed structures or organs are fully formed when first observed.
(The only observed changes to current structures or organs come from their
decay and degradation.)

4. There are distinct gaps between the known kinds of organisms. One kind
is not observed to change into another kind. We do not observe the “missing
links” because they are missing, not there, don’t exist.

5. Life only comes from life and reproduces after its own kind. Life does
not come from nonliving material. Life does not spontaneously generate

6. Mutations, the supposed driving mechanisms of evolution, are random in
nature and are neutral or harmful. They do not accumulate beneficially.
Mutations produce the wrong kind of change and will not provide for the
“upward” progressive increase in intelligence or complexity required by

7. We observe stasis, not change, in nature. Extinction is a proof of
creation. We do not find change in the fossil record nor can we measure it
in the present. Animal and plant kinds that exist today retain the same
appearance but are smaller in size than their known predecessors.

8. The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean
order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There
is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight
down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the
textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in
nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside
down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where
evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced (“younger” and “older”
layers found in repeating sequences). “Out of place” fossils are the rule
and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

9. Polystrate fossils, fossils which penetrate two or more layers of the
fossil record (most often trees), are common throughout the fossil record.
In rare cases even large animal skeletons have been found in vertical
position rather than in a horizontal position.

10. Life forms are found to be complex even in the “oldest” layers of the
fossil record. For example, various species of Trilobites are found to have
very sophisticated eyesight. Yet evolutionists say that these creatures
supposedly evolved into existence when the first multiple celled life forms
began to evolve some 620 million supposed years ago.

11. Nature does not provide us with the proof for the “Tree of Life” so
glibly talked about by evolutionists. We do not find life starting as
simple and then branching upward and outward as it becomes more and more
complex. We do not find that life forms follow the pattern of a single tree
trunk with many branches. The physical evidence provided by nature gives a
picture of an extremely large orchard with all plant and animal types
represented from the beginning with their own
individual trunks and branches producing the variations within kinds that
we have today, but no new kinds progressing from previous kinds.

12. There are no transitional forms found in the fossil record. In spite of
all the reports people may have heard, we have never found the fossil of a
plant or an animal which is a true intermediate form. The “missing links”
are missing because they are missing.

13. Be wary of artists renderings. An artist’s depiction, conception or
illustration is imaginary. Simply because we see an artist’s illustration
of a cow becoming a whale doesn’t make it so. Human desire and imagination
are not evidence.

14. Ancient man was not primitive. Ancient human cultures had more complex
languages than we do today. The engineering feasts of the past cultures are
well recognized and in some cases have not been duplicated in modern times.
There never was a Stone Age, Bronze Age or Iron Age. Man has used stone,
bronze and iron tools in all “ages” of past human activity. Indeed, there
is nothing new under the sun.

The observed Laws of Science contradict the various theories of evolution.

15. The law of Cause and Effect not only describes that for every effect
there must have been a cause, it also tells us that the cause must be
greater than the effect. No one can create anything greater than
themselves. You do not get an increase in intelligence or complexity
without the input from a greater intelligence.

16. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics work contrary to
evolutionary belief. The First Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Energy
Conservation) proves that the universe cannot be the reason for its own
existence. According to the First Law the universe cannot have been
anything less than it is, and if it cannot have been anything less than it
is, it had to come into existence whole and complete. If the universe came
into existence whole and complete, then it had to be created. Simply adding
energy to a system will not cause an increase in intelligence or
complexity. The addition of undirected energy to a system accomplishes
nothing, except possibly for the destruction of that system.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Entropy) proves that evolution
cannot happen. The Second Law stipulates (a poor attempt by scientists to
describe The Curse of Genesis Chapter 3 and Revelation) that in all
activities some of the energy becomes unavailable for further useful work.
The universe is running down, not up.

17. The concept of a “Big Bang” producing the universe is absolutely
illogical. Explosions do not produce ever increasing order and structure.
Explosions produce disorder and chaos. Explosions break things down or
destroy what was previously ordered.

18. There is no substantiated method in nature which would allow stars to
be “born.” The Gas Laws prove that the pressure of hot gases expanding
outward from a center is far greater than the gravitational force drawing
them towards a center. Stars could not evolve into existence.

19. The Law of Biogenesis (the Law of Life Beginnings) accurately states
that life only comes from life, and that life only reproduces after its own
kind. Life cannot spontaneously generate and life forms do not change from
one kind into another kind.

20. The input of undirected energy accomplishes nothing. The input of
undirected energy will destroy a system, not build it up. Only the input
from a greater intelligence will cause a beneficial increase in order
and/or complexity.

21. Not only must there be the input from a greater intelligence in order
to produce an increase in complexity and/or intelligence, that
intelligence must have a preconceived plan of action. No master craftsman
would start to build without first having a plan, a blueprint.

22. In order for evolution to be true atoms must form useful molecules such
as enzymes, amino acids and proteins by random chance. It is mathematically
impossible for these molecules, much less the far larger DNA molecule, to
form by random action in nature. It cannot happen!

23. Natural selection and survival of the fittest are supposed to be the
driving forces of progressive upward evolution. There are no selective
benefits for a supposed transitional form. There would be no advantage for
a creature to have a half-evolved eye or a half-evolved wing. Indeed, the
existence of such structures would be detrimental and serve only to
eliminate, not perpetuate, such disfigured organisms from a given

24. The presumed intermediates required by evolution do not exist. The
missing links are missing because they are missing. Reptilian scales do
not/cannot become feathers. These structures originate from different cells
within the skin tissue. Reptilian lungs do not/cannot change to become
avian (bird) lungs. Air flows in and out of reptilian lungs just as in
humans. Bird lungs have a flow through design.

25. Living organisms are incredibly complex and have specific design
features. In order to make this point please consider the following partial
list: woodpecker tongue, Bombardier Beetle chemistry, insect metamorphosis,
Giraffe heart and arterial system, Gecko feet and human eyes (or human
brains for that matter).

26. Single-celled organisms such as bacteria, amoeba and algae have the
same degree of complexity within them that multiple-celled organisms have
within them. Single-celled organisms have a skeleton, respiratory system,
digestion and elimination systems, circulatory system, reproductive system,
command and communi- cation system.

27. Life forms are irreducibly complex. To code for RNA production within a
cell you must already have whole and complete DNA. To make DNA you must
already have whole and complete RNA. In addition, it requires about 70
proteins to fabricate a DNA molecule, but you must have whole and complete
DNA to fabricate those proteins.

28. When we see design we know that there is/was a designer. The human mind
intrinsically knows the difference between randomness and design. When we
see a plastic hair comb, one of the simplest structures ever designed and
consisting of only one part, we know that it was designed and made through
intelligent effort. A plastic hair comb does not come into existence by
random chance.

If we see three stones sitting on the bottom of a clear stream we know that
they got there by the random action of the water current. If we see the
same three stones piled up one on top of the other sitting on the bank of
that stream we know that an outside intelligence placed them there.

We see design throughout nature. For good health blood must clot when it
gets outside the body, but must not clot inside the body. In addition, it
must stop clotting and not continue to clot once exposed to the outside.
The molecular motors which turn the cilia of cells look exactly like little
electric motors complete with bearings, shaft and housing. Our bodies must
make decisions to accept or reject foreign substances or our immunological
system does not work. Our bodies must also manufacture effective
countermeasures without killing us at the same time.

29. Charles Darwin stated that the existence of vestigial and retrogressive
organs and structures in the human body were essential proofs of evolution.
It has now been determined that there are NO vestigial or retrogressive
organs or structures in a human body!

30. Evolutionary theories remain incapable of explaining the existence of
sex, symbiosis or altruism.

Neanderthal Genome Results They Are Human!

This is great, Neanderthal man was finally admitted to be human. When you think of all the research that evolutionist have done and trying to match evidence to a story thought up out of an imaginative mind I am glad that I am a creationist. It just makes sense that all creatures were created. The wording of all these evolutionary documentaries are always geared and loaded towards a failed theory. I certainly appreciate the extensive research of the scientist but I just hate it when you are trying to “prove a theory” and no matter what evidence is presented. You can see an example of this in the following film.